The NWO: Chapter 6: Technological Advancements and Surveillance

 

Chapter 6: Technological Advancements and Surveillance

Technological advancements have fundamentally reshaped the global landscape, affecting everything from communication and information sharing to governance and surveillance. This chapter will delve into the details of digital technologies, the rise of mass surveillance, privacy concerns, and the challenges posed by cybersecurity threats. By examining these topics in depth, we can better understand the complexities and implications of technological advancements on global governance and individual freedoms.

Digital Technologies

The Internet and Social Media: The Impact on Global Communication and Information Sharing

Background: The internet and social media have revolutionized global communication and information sharing. The internet, which emerged in the late 20th century, has grown exponentially, connecting billions of people worldwide. Social media platforms, such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, have further transformed how information is disseminated and consumed.

Impact and Examples:

1. Global Connectivity:

   • Statistics: As of 2021, over 4.66 billion people, or 59.5% of the global population, use the internet (Internet World Stats, 2021). Social media platforms have over 3.6 billion users worldwide (Statista, 2021).
   • Example: The Arab Spring, a series of anti-government protests and uprisings that swept across the Middle East and North Africa in 2011, was largely facilitated by social media. Platforms like Facebook and Twitter enabled activists to organize protests, share information, and mobilize support (Howard & Hussain, 2013).

2. Information Sharing:

   • Statistics: Over 500 million tweets are sent daily, and over 5 billion videos are watched on YouTube every day (Statista, 2021).
   • Example: The #MeToo movement, which started in 2017, used social media to raise awareness about sexual harassment and assault. The hashtag was used millions of times across various platforms, leading to a global conversation and policy changes (Mendes, Ringrose, & Keller, 2018).

3. Economic Impact:

   • Statistics: The global digital economy is estimated to be worth over $11.5 trillion, or 15.5% of the global GDP (World Economic Forum, 2020).
   • Example: E-commerce platforms like Amazon and Alibaba have transformed retail, enabling consumers to shop globally and businesses to reach international markets.

Criticisms and Controversies:

• Misinformation and Fake News: The internet and social media have been criticized for spreading misinformation and fake news. The rapid dissemination of false information can have significant consequences, including political polarization, social unrest, and public health crises (Lazer et al., 2018).
• Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles: Social media algorithms often create echo chambers and filter bubbles, where users are exposed primarily to information that reinforces their existing beliefs. This can lead to a lack of diverse perspectives and critical thinking (Pariser, 2011).
• Digital Divide: Despite the growth of the internet, there is still a significant digital divide. Access to the internet and digital technologies is not uniform, with disparities between developed and developing countries, as well as within countries (International Telecommunication Union, 2020).

References:

• Internet World Stats. (2021). "Internet Usage Statistics." Retrieved from Internet World Stats Website.
• Statista. (2021). "Number of Social Media Users Worldwide." Retrieved from Statista Website.
• Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). "The Role of Digital Media." Journal of Democracy, 24(3), 35-48.
• Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). "Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture." Oxford University Press.
• Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., ... & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). "The Science of Fake News." Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096.
• Pariser, E. (2011). "The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You." Penguin.
• International Telecommunication Union. (2020). "Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures 2020." Retrieved from ITU Website.

Artificial Intelligence (AI): The Role of AI in Shaping Global Governance and Decision-Making

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems. AI technologies, including machine learning, natural language processing, and robotics, are increasingly being used in various sectors, from healthcare and finance to governance and decision-making.

Impact and Examples:

1. Governance and Decision-Making:

   • Statistics: The global AI market is expected to reach $190.61 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 33.1% from 2019 to 2025 (MarketsandMarkets, 2020).
   • Example: AI is being used in public administration to automate routine tasks, improve service delivery, and enhance decision-making. For instance, the U.S. government uses AI to detect fraud in welfare programs and to predict crime patterns (Deloitte, 2019).

2. Healthcare:

   • Statistics: The global AI in healthcare market is expected to reach $28 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 43.5% from 2019 to 2025 (MarketsandMarkets, 2020).
   • Example: AI is being used to diagnose diseases, develop personalized treatment plans, and predict patient outcomes. For instance, IBM's Watson for Oncology uses AI to provide evidence-based treatment options for cancer patients (IBM, 2020).

3. Finance:

   • Statistics: The global AI in finance market is expected to reach $26.67 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 23.37% from 2019 to 2025 (MarketsandMarkets, 2020).
   • Example: AI is being used in finance to detect fraud, manage risk, and provide personalized financial advice. For instance, JPMorgan Chase uses AI to analyze financial data and provide insights to its clients (JPMorgan Chase, 2020).

Criticisms and Controversies:

• Bias and Discrimination: AI systems can inadvertently perpetuate and amplify existing biases and discriminations if the data used to train them is biased. This can lead to unfair outcomes in areas such as employment, lending, and law enforcement (Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018).
• Job Displacement: AI and automation are expected to displace a significant number of jobs, particularly in sectors such as manufacturing, retail, and transportation. This raises concerns about job security, income inequality, and the need for reskilling and upskilling the workforce (McKinsey Global Institute, 2017).
• Ethical and Legal Challenges: The use of AI in decision-making raises ethical and legal challenges, including issues related to accountability, transparency, and privacy. For instance, the use of AI in law enforcement and surveillance has been criticized for its potential to infringe on civil liberties and human rights (European Commission, 2020).

References:

• MarketsandMarkets. (2020). "Artificial Intelligence Market by Technology, Offering, Technology Type, Industry Vertical, and Geography - Global Forecast to 2025." Retrieved from MarketsandMarkets Website.
• Deloitte. (2019). "AI in Government: Hype or Reality?" Retrieved from Deloitte Website.
• IBM. (2020). "Watson for Oncology." Retrieved from IBM Website.
• JPMorgan Chase. (2020). "AI and Machine Learning at JPMorgan Chase." Retrieved from JPMorgan Chase Website.
• Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). "Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification." Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, 77-91.
• McKinsey Global Institute. (2017). "Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation." Retrieved from McKinsey Website.
• European Commission. (2020). "White Paper on Artificial Intelligence - A European Approach to Excellence and Trust." Retrieved from European Commission Website.

Surveillance and Data Collection

Mass Surveillance: The Rise of Digital Technologies Has Enabled Unprecedented Levels of Surveillance and Data Collection

Background: The rise of digital technologies has enabled unprecedented levels of surveillance and data collection. Governments, corporations, and other entities are increasingly using digital tools to monitor and collect data on individuals and populations. This has significant implications for privacy, civil liberties, and global governance.

Impact and Examples:

1. Government Surveillance:

   • Statistics: According to a report by Privacy International, over 100 countries worldwide have implemented mass surveillance programs (Privacy International, 2019).
   • Example: The U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) has been criticized for its mass surveillance programs, including PRISM and XKeyscore, which collect and analyze vast amounts of data from internet communications (Greenwald, 2013).

2. Corporate Surveillance:

   • Statistics: The global data analytics market is expected to reach $77.64 billion by 2023, growing at a CAGR of 30.08% from 2018 to 2023 (MarketsandMarkets, 2018).
   • Example: Tech giants like Google and Facebook collect and analyze vast amounts of data on their users to target advertisements and personalize services. This data includes browsing history, search queries, social media activity, and location data (Zuboff, 2019).

3. Public Health Surveillance:

   • Statistics: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in public health surveillance, with over 50 countries implementing contact tracing apps (Privacy International, 2020).
   • Example: China's use of digital technologies to monitor and control the spread of COVID-19 has been criticized for its potential to infringe on civil liberties and human rights. The Chinese government has used facial recognition, location tracking, and health codes to enforce quarantine and monitor infected individuals (Kostka, 2020).

Criticisms and Controversies:

• Privacy Concerns: Mass surveillance and data collection raise significant concerns about individual privacy. The collection and analysis of personal data can reveal sensitive information about individuals, including their health, financial status, and personal relationships (Solove, 2008).
• Civil Liberties: Mass surveillance can infringe on civil liberties, including the right to freedom of expression, assembly, and association. The knowledge that one is being surveilled can have a chilling effect on political and social activities (Lyon, 2015).
• Discrimination and Bias: Surveillance technologies can be used to discriminate against and target specific groups, including racial and ethnic minorities, political dissidents, and marginalized communities. For instance, facial recognition technology has been criticized for its racial bias and potential to exacerbate existing inequalities (Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018).

References:

• Privacy International. (2019). "Global Surveillance Industry." Retrieved from Privacy International Website.
• Greenwald, G. (2013). "NSA Collecting Phone Records of Millions of Verizon Customers Daily." The Guardian. Retrieved from The Guardian Website.
• MarketsandMarkets. (2018). "Data Analytics Market by Component, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, Industry Vertical, and Region - Global Forecast to 2023." Retrieved from MarketsandMarkets Website.
• Zuboff, S. (2019). "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power." Profile Books.
• Privacy International. (2020). "COVID-19 and State Surveillance." Retrieved from Privacy International Website.
• Kostka, G. (2020). "China's Coronavirus Surveillance Could Be Here to Stay." Foreign Policy. Retrieved from Foreign Policy Website.
• Solove, D. J. (2008). "Understanding Privacy." Harvard University Press.
• Lyon, D. (2015). "Surveillance After Snowden." Polity Press.

Privacy Concerns: The Implications of Mass Surveillance for Individual Privacy and Civil Liberties

Background: The implications of mass surveillance for individual privacy and civil liberties are profound. As digital technologies enable the collection and analysis of vast amounts of data, concerns about privacy and civil liberties have grown. This section will explore the various ways in which mass surveillance impacts individual privacy and civil liberties.

Impact and Examples:

1. Data Breaches and Leaks:

   • Statistics: According to the Identity Force 2020 Data Breach Report, there were 1,001 data breaches in the U.S. in 2020, exposing over 155.8 million records (Identity Force, 2021).
   • Example: The 2017 Equifax data breach exposed the personal information of over 147 million people, including names, Social Security numbers, and credit card numbers. The breach highlighted the vulnerabilities of data collection and the potential for significant harm to individuals (Equifax, 2017).

2. Targeted Advertising and Manipulation:

   • Statistics: The global digital advertising market is expected to reach $517.51 billion by 2023, growing at a CAGR of 12.1% from 2018 to 2023 (MarketsandMarkets, 2018).
   • Example: The Cambridge Analytica scandal revealed how personal data collected from Facebook was used to target political advertisements and manipulate public opinion. The scandal highlighted the potential for mass surveillance to undermine democratic processes and civil liberties (Cadwalladr & Graham-Harrison, 2018).

3. Government Overreach:

   • Statistics: A survey by the Pew Research Center found that 74% of Americans have limited their online activities due to privacy concerns (Pew Research Center, 2019).
   • Example: The U.S. Patriot Act, enacted in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, expanded the government's surveillance powers, allowing for the collection of metadata and the interception of communications. The act has been criticized for its potential to infringe on civil liberties and individual privacy (Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2020).

Criticisms and Controversies:

• Lack of Transparency: Mass surveillance programs often lack transparency, with governments and corporations collecting and analyzing data without the knowledge or consent of individuals. This lack of transparency undermines trust in institutions and raises concerns about accountability and oversight (Solove, 2008).
• Chilling Effect: The knowledge that one is being surveilled can have a chilling effect on political and social activities. Individuals may self-censor or avoid certain behaviors out of fear of being monitored, which can undermine freedom of expression and association (Lyon, 2015).
• Disproportionate Impact: Mass surveillance can have a disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, including racial and ethnic minorities, political dissidents, and vulnerable populations. These groups may be subject to increased scrutiny and discrimination, exacerbating existing inequalities (Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018).

References:

• Identity Force. (2021). "2020 Data Breach Report." Retrieved from Identity Force Website.
• Equifax. (2017). "Cybersecurity Incident & Important Consumer Information." Retrieved from Equifax Website.
• MarketsandMarkets. (2018). "Digital Advertising Market by Technology, Platform, Device, Industry Vertical, and Region - Global Forecast to 2023." Retrieved from MarketsandMarkets Website.
• Cadwalladr, C., & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018). "Revealed: 50 Million Facebook Profiles Harvested for Cambridge Analytica in Major Data Breach." The Guardian. Retrieved from The Guardian Website.
• Pew Research Center. (2019). "Americans and Privacy: Concerned, Confused and Feeling Lack of Control Over Their Personal Information." Retrieved from Pew Research Center Website.
• Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2020). "The USA PATRIOT Act." Retrieved from EFF Website.

Cybersecurity and Global Governance

Cybersecurity Threats: The Challenges Posed by Cybersecurity Threats to Global Governance

Background: Cybersecurity threats pose significant challenges to global governance. As digital technologies become increasingly integrated into all aspects of society, the risks associated with cyber attacks have grown. This section will explore the various types of cybersecurity threats and their implications for global governance.

Impact and Examples:

1. Cyber Espionage:

   • Statistics: According to a report by FireEye, over 70% of organizations have experienced a cyber espionage attack in the past year (FireEye, 2020).
   • Example: The 2017 NotPetya cyber attack, attributed to Russian hackers, targeted Ukrainian businesses and government agencies, causing significant disruption and economic damage. The attack highlighted the potential for cyber espionage to undermine national security and global stability (Greenberg, 2018).

2. Cyber Crime:

   • Statistics: The global cost of cyber crime is expected to reach $6 trillion annually by 2021, up from $3 trillion in 2015 (Cybersecurity Ventures, 2019).
   • Example: The 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack affected over 200,000 computers in 150 countries, including hospitals, businesses, and government agencies. The attack highlighted the potential for cyber crime to cause widespread disruption and harm (Mohurle & Patil, 2017).

3. Cyber Warfare:

   • Statistics: A report by the Council on Foreign Relations found that over 20 countries have developed or are developing offensive cyber capabilities (Council on Foreign Relations, 2018).
   • Example: The 2010 Stuxnet attack, attributed to the U.S. and Israel, targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, causing significant damage to the country's nuclear program. The attack highlighted the potential for cyber warfare to escalate international conflicts and undermine global security (Sanger, 2012).

Criticisms and Controversies:

• Lack of International Cooperation:Cybersecurity threats often transcend national borders, requiring international cooperation to address them effectively. However, the lack of international cooperation and coordination can hinder efforts to combat cyber threats and undermine global governance (United Nations, 2019).
• Attribution Challenges: Attributing cyber attacks to specific actors can be challenging, as attackers often use sophisticated techniques to conceal their identity. This can make it difficult to hold actors accountable and deter future attacks (Rid & Buchanan, 2015).
• Unequal Capabilities: There is a significant disparity in cybersecurity capabilities among countries, with developed countries often having more advanced capabilities than developing countries. This can create vulnerabilities and exacerbate existing inequalities (International Telecommunication Union, 2020).

References:

• FireEye. (2020). "M-Trends 2020: Insights into Today's Cyber Attacks and Trends." Retrieved from FireEye Website.
• Greenberg, A. (2018). "The Untold Story of NotPetya, the Most Devastating Cyberattack in History." Wired. Retrieved from Wired Website.
• Cybersecurity Ventures. (2019). "2019 Official Annual Cybercrime Report." Retrieved from Cybersecurity Ventures Website.
• Mohurle, S., & Patil, S. (2017). "WannaCry Ransomware Attack: A Detailed Analysis." International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 7(8), 1-8.
• Council on Foreign Relations. (2018). "Cyber Operations and the Use of Force." Retrieved from CFR Website.
• Sanger, D. E. (2012). "Confront and Conceal: Obama's Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power." Crown.
• United Nations. (2019). "A/RES/73/27: Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security." Retrieved from UN Website.
• Rid, T., & Buchanan, B. (2015). "Attributing Cyber Attacks." Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(1-2), 4-37.
• International Telecommunication Union. (2020). "Global Cybersecurity Index 2020." Retrieved from ITU Website.

International Cooperation: The Need for International Cooperation in Addressing Cybersecurity Issues

Background: Addressing cybersecurity threats requires international cooperation and coordination. As cyber attacks transcend national borders, the need for a global approach to cybersecurity has become increasingly apparent. This section will explore the various initiatives and frameworks aimed at promoting international cooperation in cybersecurity.

Impact and Examples:

1. United Nations:

   • Statistics: The United Nations Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security (UN GGE) has been working since 2004 to develop norms and principles for responsible state behavior in cyberspace (United Nations, 2019).
   • Example: The UN GGE has developed a set of 11 norms for responsible state behavior in cyberspace, including the principle that states should not knowingly allow their territory to be used for internationally wrongful acts using information and communications technologies (ICTs) (United Nations, 2015).

2. Council of Europe:

   • Statistics: The Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime, also known as the Budapest Convention, has been ratified by 65 countries, including non-member states (Council of Europe, 2020).
   • Example: The Budapest Convention provides a framework for international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting cybercrimes. It includes provisions for mutual legal assistance, extradition, and the sharing of evidence (Council of Europe, 2001).

3. Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace (GCSC):

   • Statistics: The GCSC was established in 2017 to develop norms and policies to enhance international security and stability in cyberspace (Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace, 2017).
   • Example: The GCSC has proposed a set of norms for responsible behavior in cyberspace, including the principle that states should not conduct or knowingly support cyber operations that intentionally disrupt the general availability or integrity of the public core of the internet (GCSC, 2019).

Criticisms and Controversies:

• Lack of Enforcement Mechanisms:International frameworks and initiatives often lack enforcement mechanisms, making it difficult to hold states accountable for violations of cybersecurity norms and principles (United Nations, 2019).
• Political Divisions: Political divisions and disagreements among states can hinder efforts to promote international cooperation in cybersecurity. For instance, the UN GGE has struggled to reach consensus on key issues, including the applicability of international law to cyberspace (United Nations, 2017).
• Technological Challenges: The rapid pace of technological change can make it difficult to develop and implement effective cybersecurity measures. The constant evolution of cyber threats requires ongoing adaptation and innovation (International Telecommunication Union, 2020).

References:

• United Nations. (2019). "A/RES/73/27: Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security." Retrieved from UN Website.
• United Nations. (2015). "A/70/174: Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security." Retrieved from UN Website.
• Council of Europe. (2020). "Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention)." Retrieved from Council of Europe Website.
• Council of Europe. (2001). "Convention on Cybercrime." Retrieved from Council of Europe Website.
• Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace. (2017). "About the GCSC." Retrieved from GCSC Website.
• Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace. (2019). "Norm Package Singapore." Retrieved from GCSC Website.
• United Nations. (2017). "A/72/327: Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security." Retrieved from UN Website.
• International Telecommunication Union. (2020). "Global Cybersecurity Index 2020." Retrieved from ITU Website.

Conclusion

Technological advancements have fundamentally reshaped the global landscape, affecting everything from communication and information sharing to governance and surveillance. The internet and social media have revolutionized global communication, enabling unprecedented levels of connectivity and information sharing. However, they have also raised concerns about misinformation, echo chambers, and the digital divide. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly important role in shaping global governance and decision-making, with applications in healthcare, finance, and public administration. However, AI also raises concerns about bias, job displacement, and ethical and legal challenges.

The rise of digital technologies has enabled unprecedented levels of surveillance and data collection, with significant implications for privacy, civil liberties, and global governance. Mass surveillance by governments and corporations has raised concerns about individual privacy, civil liberties, and the potential for discrimination and bias. Cybersecurity threats pose significant challenges to global governance, with cyber espionage, cyber crime, and cyber warfare highlighting the need for international cooperation and coordination.

Addressing these challenges requires a global approach, with international frameworks and initiatives aimed at promoting cooperation and coordination in cybersecurity. The United Nations, the Council of Europe, and the Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace are among the organizations working to develop norms and principles for responsible state behavior in cyberspace. However, these efforts face challenges related to enforcement, political divisions, and technological change.

Understanding the complexities and implications of technological advancements and surveillance is essential for analyzing the trends and mechanisms of global governance and for addressing the challenges of a globalized world. As we continue to explore the idea of a New World Order, it is important to engage in critical and nuanced discussions that take into account the diverse perspectives and concerns of global actors. By doing so, we can develop a more comprehensive understanding of the New World Order and its potential impact on the future of global governance and individual freedoms.

Next: Global Health and Environmental Policies